Dne 27.5.2011 19:24, Andre Majorel napsal(a): > Suppose you want to write a program that connects to a > PostgreSQL database and lists its tables and views, the type of > their columns and their relationships (REFERENCES) for automatic > joins. > > Would you look at the system tables (pg_class et al.) or the > output of psql \d, \dt, etc ? System tables (old-fashioned pg_ catalogs or information_schema). Psql reads those catalogs anyway, so parsing the output seems like an unnecessary step. > While parsing the output of psql is cumbersome, accessing the > system tables seems more likely to break whenever a new version > of PostgreSQL comes out. Really? Those catalogs are pretty stable, and when changed they're usually extended (new columns are added). So well written queries won't break very often. Actually I'd expect the psql output to change much more often. regards Tomas -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
