Craig Ringer <craig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > max_connections = 100 # (change requires restart) > # WARNING: If you're about to increase max_connections above 100, you > # should probably be using a connection pool instead. See: > # http://wiki.postgresql.org/max_connections This gives the impression that performance is great at 100 and falls off a cliff at 101, which is both incorrect and likely to lower peoples' opinion of the software. I'd suggest wording more like "if you're considering raising max_connections into the thousands, you should probably use a connection pool instead". And I agree with Merlin that a wiki pointer is inappropriate. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
