On Monday 04 April 2011 21:20:51 John R Pierce wrote: > On 04/04/11 12:07 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: > > ..horribly documented, inefficient, user-hostile, impossible to > > maintain interpreted language.. > > to whom might you be alluding to > > I only used a few of those adjectives, and prefixed them by > hypothetical. to be honest, I would expect most languages commonly > used in web service environments to be more efficient at string > processing than pl/pgsql, and I really can't think of a counterexample > off the top of my head. I had to move a piece of regexp/replace logic from PHP into pl/pgsql because PHP couldn't handle more than abt. 50 replacements in one text unit, instead it just dumped the text in the bit bucket. It was probably a memory allocation problem. On the other hand pl/pgsql has had no problem with the logic. Documentation here: <http://solumslekt.org/blog/?p=23> regards, Leif -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
