2010/10/14 Massa, Harald Armin <chef@xxxxxxx>
Dmitriy,
Again, I suggest PQlibVersion() or PQversion() instead of PQlibpqVersion().
Why this "pq" redundancy in name? Waste of bytes.the first PQ qualifies the name-space "those are PostgresQl functions".the library is called libpq, and we are explicitly asking for the version of libpq; not of any other library that may or may not be connected with libpqÂ
If "PQ" is "namespace", so PQlibVersion() will never conflict with other libraries.
Â
Â
(in some compilations there is linkage to some system libraries, which have versions of their own. in other implementations there are wrappers around the libpq-libraray, which have their own version to. Oh, and there is open-ssl which may be mixed into Âthe whole party)So 2 bytes of source-code / linker redundancy in times where smartphones sport 12Gigabyte should be payed....
I don't worry about source-code or linker. I want correctness.
Why libpq does not have PQlibpqConnect() ? How about other libraries linked to libpq ?
Waste of bytes.
Why libpq does not have PQlibpqConnect() ? How about other libraries linked to libpq ?
Waste of bytes.
Harald--ÂGHUM GmbH
Harald Armin Massa
Spielberger StraÃe 49
70435 Stuttgart
0173/9409607
Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 734971
-
persuadere.
et programmare
--
// Dmitriy.