Again, I suggest PQlibVersion() or PQversion() instead of PQlibpqVersion().
Why this "pq" redundancy in name? Waste of bytes.
2010/10/14 Massa, Harald Armin <chef@xxxxxxx>
And the dynamic linker will take anyÂversion of libpq.so that has the same major number, meaning that you
Âcannot assume that it's not 8.4 just because you built against 9.0.
[...]Not to mention when you're on windows (and I dunno if any other
platforms are like *that*), where they're all Âlibpq.dll and we'll
happily take *any* other libpq.dll (even an older one, but that willÂgive you an error if you're actually using any functions not presentÂin it).
So there are quite many arguments for Âadding aÂÂPQlibpqVersion()to libpq, yeah? Do you think you will do it, Magnus?[updates: the other "got bitten by the BYTEA-encoding-change"-thread is connected to this....]Best wishes,Harald--
GHUM GmbH
Harald Armin Massa
Spielberger StraÃe 49
70435 Stuttgart
0173/9409607
Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 734971
-
persuadere.
et programmare
--
// Dmitriy.
