John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > yeah. generally when money is involved in the transactions, you gotta stick > to the 'no committed data lost ever'. there's plenty of other use cases for > that too. Well, it's a cost/benefit/risk evaluation you have to make. It'd be bad news that the cost for covering your risk is more expensive that the risk itself, meaning there's no benefit walking the extra mile. Regards, -- dim -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
