Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Native DB replication for PG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 13:42 -0700, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Gauthier, Dave
> >> <dave.gauthier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> I believe v9 will have native DB master/slave DB replication (correct if
> >>> wrong).  If so, what's the best guess on when will v9 be released?
> >> 
> >> If I had to plan server deployments for the next year (and I do) I'd
> >> be sticking with pg 8.3 and a proven replication engine.  Next summer
> >
> >Surely you mean 8.4? :-)

No, I would buy the 8.3 argument as well. Depending on your conservative
level. 8.4 is fine and all but 8.3 is about as rock solid as it gets. It
is a great baseline at this point.

Joshua D. Drake


-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering



-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux