>> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Gauthier, Dave >> <dave.gauthier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I believe v9 will have native DB master/slave DB replication (correct if >>> wrong). If so, what's the best guess on when will v9 be released? >> >> If I had to plan server deployments for the next year (and I do) I'd >> be sticking with pg 8.3 and a proven replication engine. Next summer > >Surely you mean 8.4? :-) > >Ray. I googled postgres 8.4 feathres and found no mention of DB replication support at... http://www.postgresql.org/about/press/features84.html -----Original Message----- From: Raymond O'Donnell [mailto:rod@xxxxxx] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 4:39 PM To: Scott Marlowe Cc: Gauthier, Dave; pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Native DB replication for PG On 30/04/2010 21:30, Scott Marlowe wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Gauthier, Dave > <dave.gauthier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I believe v9 will have native DB master/slave DB replication (correct if >> wrong). If so, what's the best guess on when will v9 be released? > > If I had to plan server deployments for the next year (and I do) I'd > be sticking with pg 8.3 and a proven replication engine. Next summer Surely you mean 8.4? :-) Ray. -- Raymond O'Donnell :: Galway :: Ireland rod@xxxxxx -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
