On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Martin Gainty <mgainty@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > it has been years since i've mucked in the C++ swamp but > that means your (near) heap is ok but you're stack is hosed.. > > probably specific to compiler (version) and Operating System(version) and > environment settings..ping back if you are still experiencing those problems > with those configuration settings > Ok, now it's working. In GNU/Linux with gcc 4.4.1, and I hope in Windows XP too (it will be tested). Many thanks! > Saludos Cordiales desde EEUU! > Martin Gainty ¡Saludos desde España también! Jorge > ______________________________________________ > Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité > > Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene > Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte > Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht > dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine > rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von > E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen. > > Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le > destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire > informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie > de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura > pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email > peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter > aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. > > > > >> From: jorgearevalo@xxxxxxxxxxxx >> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:45:41 +0200 >> Subject: Re: Writing SRF >> To: tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> CC: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Jorge Arevalo <jorgearevalo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> Yes. For example, the function expects 2 arguments, and it's called >> >> with 2 arguments: 1 composite type (following this format >> >> >> >> https://svn.osgeo.org/postgis/spike/wktraster/doc/RFC1-SerializedFormat) >> >> and one integer. But PG_NARGS() returns a really big value (16297) >> >> when I first check the number of arguments at the beginning of the >> >> function. Has sense? >> > >> > Given only that data point, I would guess that you forgot to mark the >> > function as being called with V1 protocol (PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1). >> > >> > regards, tom lane >> > >> >> Many thanks! That was one of my errors. Another one was this: >> >> char szDataPointer[10]; >> sprintf(szDataPointer, "%p", a_pointer); >> >> These lines caused a memory error. I changed them for: >> >> char * pszDataPointer; >> pszDataPointer = (char *)allocator(10 * sizeof(char)); >> sprintf(pszDataPointer, "%p", a_pointer); >> >> Meaning "allocator" a memory allocator in a valid memory context for >> PostgreSQL. >> >> And seems to work :-). Is the static memory "dangerous" in a >> PostgreSQL memory context? >> >> Thanks again! >> Jorge >> >> -- >> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) >> To make changes to your subscription: >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > > ________________________________ > The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with > Hotmail. Get busy. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
