Jorge Arevalo <jorgearevalo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Yes. For example, the function expects 2 arguments, and it's called > with 2 arguments: 1 composite type (following this format > https://svn.osgeo.org/postgis/spike/wktraster/doc/RFC1-SerializedFormat) > and one integer. But PG_NARGS() returns a really big value (16297) > when I first check the number of arguments at the beginning of the > function. Has sense? Given only that data point, I would guess that you forgot to mark the function as being called with V1 protocol (PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1). regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
