|
I just looked into timesten, at 46K for perpetual licence or 10k for yearly plus support. Is there anything else available? LOL Chris > Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:39:37 -0700 > From: pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To: compuguruchrisbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxx > CC: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Does anyone use in ram postgres database? > > Chris Barnes wrote: > > > > > > We are testing in memory postgres database and have questions about > > configuring the ram mount point and whether there is great gains in > > setting it up this way? Are there any considerations for postgres? > > > > If you have experience, can you please give us some ideas on how you > > have accomplished this? > > > > you might look into TimesTen... Oracle bought them a couple years ago, > they have an SQL database thats heavily optimized for memory rather than > block oriented disk. it optionally uses a disk as a persistence backing > store. Of course, the entire database has to fit in ram, and they > charge proportional to database size. its extremely fast. > > > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general Take your contacts everywhere. Try Messenger for mobile |
