In response to Stefan Schwarzer : > >You may also wish to review Andreas' suggestions as they propose a > >more sensible table structure rather than having a table for each > >convention. > > The table proposal really looks nice. But our database is structured > by variable - so each convention has its own table. It is a really bad design - it can't scale. A new convention, and you have to redesign your database schema (add a new table, rewrite code). I think, it makes absolutely no sense to invest more work into this, sorry, shit. Regards, Andreas -- Andreas Kretschmer Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header) GnuPG: 0x31720C99, 1006 CCB4 A326 1D42 6431 2EB0 389D 1DC2 3172 0C99 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
