Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Possible causes for database corruption and solutions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16/12/2009 6:39 AM, Michael Clark wrote:
Hello all,

Over the past 6 months or so I have posted to the list a couple times
looking for information regarding recovering databases from corruption.
  At the time the incidents of corruption among our users was very low,
but the frequency is starting to increase, most likely due to the
increased user base that has upgraded to the version of our software
that uses Postgres.

I have a couple questions I am hoping to get some feedback on.

Secondly, I ask about an alternative solution to the corruption problem
because with preliminary testing we have seen a significant degradation
in performance.

From changing to fsync_writethrough ? That's a good thing - it suggests that maybe now the data is actually hitting disk when Pg asks it to.

You can have fast(er), or safe, but not both. Now that your database is actually doing what it should be and truthfully promising that data has hit disk when you commit, you may have to adopt some strategies to reduce the number of very short repetitive transactions you perform.

( Should Pg perhaps detect OS X and switch the default to fsync_writethrough ? Or are the "test to see if fsync() works on startup" plans going anywhere? )

I then restore the dump into a newly created DB (createdb -E UTF8 Test1)
with the command:
pg_restore -F c -d Test1 pgbackup

Make sure to do the restore in a single transaction. It will be *enormously*, *massively* faster. See the "--single-transaction" option to pg_restore.

If you can't do that, then set a commit_delay so that PostgreSQL can batch the fsync()s for commmits together. See postgresql.conf and the documentation for commit_delay and commit_siblings.

I am hoping there may be an alternative to fsync_writethrough and/or we
are barking up the wrong tree w.r.t. the cause of the corruptions.

If fsync_writethrough slowed things down that much then you've almost certainly nailed the cause of the corruptions. Now you just need to tune your DB, and adapt how you use the DB, so that you're less affected by the necessary performance hit imposed by safe and reliable use of disk storage.

--
Craig Ringer

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux