Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Why not? If they really want to prohibit use of a feature the upstream > project has decided should be standard, that's their privilege. Well, I guess they could also automate their database creation to fix the privileges and assign the ownership of the language to the owner of the database. Then whether or not to have plpgsql there is up to the owner. For non-hosted environments, you always want to tweak some things, like installing plpgsql in the first place. So... > The argument against seems to be basically "this should work exactly > like it did before", but if that's the standard then we can never > have plpgsql installed by default at all. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for having plpgsql installed by default. I though we were talking about how to provide that and trying to decide if having to be superuser to drop plpgsql after having created the database is blocking the way forward, knowing than installing the language only requires being database owner. Regards, -- dim -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
