Andrew Gierth <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Tom> Hm, I think that's only a problem if we define it to be a > Tom> problem, and I'm not sure it's necessary to do so. > The complaint is that if plpgsql is installed by default, then it will > be owned by postgres rather than by the db owner, who will then not be > able to drop it or use grant/revoke on it. Right, just like every other thing that's pre-installed. If a particular installation wishes to let individual DB owners control this, the superuser can drop plpgsql from template1. It's not apparent to me why we need to allow non-superusers to override the project's decisions about what should be installed by default. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
