On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think the Oracle guy's version could easily be adapted to PG 8.4 --- > those little rownum subqueries seem to be just a substitute for not > having generate_series(1,9), and everything else is just string-pushing. > Don't have time to try it myself right now, though. Interestingly the first thing I ran into when I started doing so was that apparently Oracle *doesn't* handle the lack of the RECURSIVE attribute properly. It still put the common table expressions in scope for the subsequent common table expressions even without the RECURSIVE keyword, which is apparently just a noise word in Oracle. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
