On 25/09/2009, at 12:50 PM, Selena Deckelmann wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Cédric Villemain
<cedric.villemain@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Le jeudi 24 septembre 2009, Selena Deckelmann a écrit :
Hi!
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Bryan Montgomery <monty@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to replicate am master database to multiple
(100+)
databases that are taken in to the field. Currently for each
laptop we
dump and load the tables. However,there is only a small
percentage of
data that changes on a frequent basis.
I've been looking around and come across pyerplica, londiste and
bucardo
- the documentation on most of these is fairly sparse. It seems
that
Bucardo may be the best bet - at least initially.
Bucardo is a good choice for this usage model because it was
originally designed to work over a lossy network connections.
yes, but isn't bucardo designed to 2 nodes only ?
No, definitely not! You can replicate to any number of systems. And
you can group them in whatever groups you'd like. Multi-master (as
Joshua said) only works between two nodes, but master->slave can be
from a master, to any number of slaves.
I use bucardo extensively across multiple sites and with complex
replication requirements. It does a great job.
regards
Grant
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
