On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Le jeudi 24 septembre 2009, Selena Deckelmann a écrit : >> Hi! >> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Bryan Montgomery <monty@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I'm looking for a way to replicate am master database to multiple (100+) >> > databases that are taken in to the field. Currently for each laptop we >> > dump and load the tables. However,there is only a small percentage of >> > data that changes on a frequent basis. >> > >> > I've been looking around and come across pyerplica, londiste and bucardo >> > - the documentation on most of these is fairly sparse. It seems that >> > Bucardo may be the best bet - at least initially. >> >> Bucardo is a good choice for this usage model because it was >> originally designed to work over a lossy network connections. > > yes, but isn't bucardo designed to 2 nodes only ? No, definitely not! You can replicate to any number of systems. And you can group them in whatever groups you'd like. Multi-master (as Joshua said) only works between two nodes, but master->slave can be from a master, to any number of slaves. -- http://chesnok.com/daily - me http://endpoint.com - work -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
