When grilled further on (Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:19:05 -0700), Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> confessed: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Huh? I just use Spamassassin myself, with Razor/Pyzor/DCC and Bayes all > > enabled ... > > I use exactly the same setup. But recently I've noticed that the > spammers are getting smarter -- I think 20% of it is slipping by the > filters. I'm going to need something better. > Have you played with the "spamassassin --report" feature? Works fairly well if you can integrate it into your e-mail client and report a bunch of messages as spam. It trains the Bayes filter and reports to Razor (at the least). Sylpheed Claws has actions (you use "spamassassin--report %F" as the action), and it'll batch the report on all selected messages. I find that after a 10-20 messages, it starts finding the ones that were slipping through. Since February, I have 200 missed out of 4200. Cheers, Rob -- 22:28:27 up 3 days, 2:06, 3 users, load average: 3.24, 3.08, 3.45 Linux 2.6.5-01 #5 SMP Tue Apr 6 21:32:39 MDT 2004
Attachment:
pgp00183.pgp
Description: PGP signature
