Joe Conway wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Huh? I just use Spamassassin myself, with Razor/Pyzor/DCC and Bayes all > > enabled ... > > I use exactly the same setup. But recently I've noticed that the > spammers are getting smarter -- I think 20% of it is slipping by the > filters. I'm going to need something better. Here is what I use: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/spam/ I get 98% blockage with no false positives, or at least only 1-2 a year (that folks tell me about). :-) -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
