On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Here's an idea: look at their code to see what kind of SQL jiggery pokery > they needed to implement it and then implement it ourselves... I wish PostgreSQL got this functionality. > > BTW, from my estimates you'd need at least 4 - 6 sql queries to simulate the > REPLACE syntax for Postgres, so why on earth would you use it? > Chris Why so many? It is simple enough to attempt a delete and then do an insert.
