> We can discuss names, till the cows come home, but basically Manuel > described what he meant. The "replace" functionality is one of the few > things I liked of MySQL when I researched which dB to go with. The fact > that this layer can abstract the functionality is a great point in my > opinion. Here's an idea: look at their code to see what kind of SQL jiggery pokery they needed to implement it and then implement it ourselves... BTW, from my estimates you'd need at least 4 - 6 sql queries to simulate the REPLACE syntax for Postgres, so why on earth would you use it? Chris
