Akihiko Odaki wrote: > On 2017-06-23 20:20, Albe Laurenz wrote: >> You could either try to do something like >> >> SELECT * >> FROM (SELECT "posts".* >> FROM "posts" >> JOIN "follows" ON "follows"."target_account" = "posts"."account" >> WHERE "follows"."owner_account" = $1 >> OFFSET 0) q >> ORDER BY "posts"."timestamp" >> LIMIT 100; > > Now I wonder whether it actually sorted or not. As you said, I want to > "find rows with the greatest 'timestamp', match with rows from 'posts' > in a nested loop and stop as soon as it has found 100 matches". > > However, it seems to query 100 records without any consideration for > "timestamp", and then sorts them. That is not expected. Here is a > abstract query plan: > > Limit > -> Sort > Sort Key: posts.id DESC > -> Nested Loop > -> Seq Scan on follows > Filter: (owner_account = $1) > -> Index Scan using index_posts_on_account on posts > Index Cond: (account_id = follows.target_account) > > index_posts_on_account is an obsolete index on "posts" and only for > "account". So it does nothing for sorting "timestamp". That should be fine. It fetches all rows from "follows" that match the condition, Then joins them will all matching rows from "posts", sorts the result descending by "id" and returns the 100 rows with the largest value for "id". So you will get those 100 rows from "posts" with the largest "id" that have a match in "follows" where the condition is fulfilled. It is just a different plan to do the same thing that is more efficient in your case. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
