Re: how to improve perf of 131MM row table?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Shaun Thomas <sthomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 06/26/2014 09:22 AM, AJ Weber wrote:

I sent the details as identified by pgAdmin III.

Interesting. Either there is a bug in pgAdmin, or you're connecting to a different database that is missing the primary key. What is the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output if you execute the query you sent on a psql prompt?


     "alf_node_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id) CLUSTER
would indicate to me that there is a PK on alf_node table, it is on
column "id", it is of type btree, and the table is clustered around that
index.

Am I reading this totally wrong?

No, that's right. But that wasn't in the SQL you sent. In fact, there's a lot of stuff missing in that output.

Try running the EXPLAIN ANALYZE using the same psql connection you used to retrieve the actual table structure just now. I suspect you've accidentally connected to the wrong database. If it's still doing the sequence scan, we'll have to dig deeper.
 

​I see "CONSTRAINT alf_node_pkey PRIMARY KEY (id)" for table1 and ​"CONSTRAINT alf_node_properties_pkey PRIMARY KEY (node_id, qname_id, list_index, locale_id)" for table2. When you say there is not primary key defined, is it based on the execution plan ?

Sébastien

[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux