Andrew Dunstan <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > If we're going to do it can we please come up with something more > intuitive and much, much more documented than "OFFSET 0"? And if/when we > do this we'll need to have big red warnings all over then release notes, > since a lot of people I know will need to do some extensive remediation > before moving to such a release. The probability that we would actually *remove* that behavior of OFFSET 0 is not distinguishable from zero. I'm not terribly excited about having an alternate syntax to specify an optimization fence, but even if we do create such a thing, there's no need to break the historical usage. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
