On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Craig James <cjames@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Andrea Suisani <sickpig@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> (I suspect that there's something wrong with the PERC >> because, having the controller cache enabled make no >> difference in terms of TPS), it seems strange that disabling >> HT from the bios will give lesser TPS that HT disable through >> sysfs interface. > > Well, all I can say is that I like my 3WARE controllers, and it's the > secondary reason why I moved away from Dell (the primary reason is > price). Mediocre performance, random lockups, and Dell's refusal to address said lockups are the reasons I abandoned Dell's PERC controllers. My preference is Areca 1680/1880, then 3Ware 96xx, then LSI, then Adaptec. Areca's web interface on a dedicated ethernet port make them super easy to configure while the machine is running with no need for specialized software for a given OS, and they're performance and reliability are great. The 3Wares are very solid with later model BIOS on board. LSI gets a rasberry for MegaCLI, the 2nd klunkiest interface ever, the worst being their horrible horrible BIOS boot setup screen. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance