Re: local-storage versus SAN sequential read performance comparison

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/21/2012 10:41 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:

How fast is the link to your SAN?  If it's Gigabit, then 80MB/s would
be pretty reasonable.

Wow, I didn't even think of that. I was looking up specs on the SAN. :)

Those stats are pretty horrible for sequential reads. The SAN should improve random reads, not mercilessly ruin sequential.

That does sound like the problem, though.

--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 500 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-444-8534
sthomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

______________________________________________

See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email

--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux