Istvan Endredy <istvan.endredy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > i've ran into a planning problem. > If effective_cache_size has a greater value (6GB), this select has > a bad planning and long query time (2000ms): Could you try that configuration with one change and let us know how it goes?: set cpu_tuple_cost = '0.05'; I've seen an awful lot of queries benefit from a higher value for that setting, and I'm starting to think a change to that default is in order. -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
