no problem Scott, thanks for your appreciations 2011/12/5 Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Ernesto Quiñones <ernestoq@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> vacuum_cost_delay 1s >>> vacuum_cost_limit 200 >> >> Those are insane settings for vacuum costing, even on a very slow >> machine. Basically you're starving vacuum and autovacuum so much that >> they can never keep up. > > sorry, the word I meant there was pathological. No insult intended. -- ---------------------------------------------------------- Visita : http://www.eqsoft.net ---------------------------------------------------------- Sigueme en Twitter : http://www.twitter.com/ernestoq -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
