On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Ernesto Quiñones <ernestoq@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> vacuum_cost_delay 1s >> vacuum_cost_limit 200 > > Those are insane settings for vacuum costing, even on a very slow > machine. Basically you're starving vacuum and autovacuum so much that > they can never keep up. sorry, the word I meant there was pathological. No insult intended. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
