I was doing a little testing to see how machine load affected the
performance of different types of queries, index range scans, hash joins,
full scans, a mix, etc.
In order to do this, I isolated different performance hits, spinning only
CPU, loading the disk to create high I/O wait states, and using most of
the physical memory. This was on a 4 CPU Xen virtual machine running
8.1.22 on CENTOS.
Here is the fun part. When running 8 threads spinning calculating square
roots (using the stress package), the full scan returned consistently 60%
faster than the machine with no load. It was returning 44,000 out of
5,000,000 rows. Here is the explain analyze. I am hoping that this
triggers something (I can run more tests as needed) that can help us make
it always better.
Idling:
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on schedule_details (cost=0.00..219437.90 rows=81386 width=187)
(actual time=0.053..2915.966 rows=44320 loops=1)
Filter: (schedule_type = '5X'::bpchar)
Total runtime: 2986.764 ms
Loaded:
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on schedule_details (cost=0.00..219437.90 rows=81386 width=187)
(actual time=0.034..1698.068 rows=44320 loops=1)
Filter: (schedule_type = '5X'::bpchar)
Total runtime: 1733.084 ms
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
