Re: MySQL HandlerSocket - Is this possible in PG?

[Michael Ben-Nes <michael@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Pavel,

Thanks for your quick answer. Can you please elaborate a bit more about the points bellow.

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello

you can emulate it now.

a) try to do a simple stored procedure, where you can wrap your query

Do you mean I should use PREPARE?

b) use a FAST CALL API to call this procedure

Currently I use PHP to access the DB which use libpq. Is that cosidered a fast call API ? if not, can you please refer me to the right info.
 

c) use a some pool tool for pooling and persisting sessions

PHP pg_pconnect command open a persistent PostgreSQL connection. Is it enough or I better use PgPool2 or something similar?

 
Considering the points above, will I be able to get such high QPS from PostgreSQL ? If so, it will be my pleasure to dump Reddis and work solely with PG :)


Thanks,
Miki

Regards

Pavel Stehule

2010/12/21 Michael Ben-Nes <michael@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Hi,
>
> Just stumbled on the following post:
> http://yoshinorimatsunobu.blogspot.com/2010/10/using-mysql-as-nosql-story-for.html
>
> The post claim that MySQL can do more qps then MemCahed or any other NoSQL
> when doing simple queries like: SELECT * FROM table WHERE id=num;
>
> And I wonder if:
>
> 1. Currently, is it possbile to achive the same using PG 9.0.x
> 2. Is it possible at all?
>
> It seems to me that if such gain is possible, PG should benefit from that
> significantly when it comes to Key/Value queries.
>
>
> Best,
> Miki
>
>

--------------------------------------------------
Michael Ben-Nes - Internet Consultant and Director.
http://www.epoch.co.il - weaving the Net.
Cellular: 054-4848113
--------------------------------------------------