Hi,
Just stumbled on the following post:
http://yoshinorimatsunobu.blogspot.com/2010/10/using-mysql-as-nosql-story-for.html
The post claim that MySQL can do more qps then MemCahed or any other NoSQL when doing simple queries like: SELECT * FROM table WHERE id=num;
And I wonder if:
1. Currently, is it possbile to achive the same using PG 9.0.x
2. Is it possible at all?
It seems to me that if such gain is possible, PG should benefit from that significantly when it comes to Key/Value queries.
Best,
Miki
--------------------------------------------------
Michael Ben-Nes - Internet Consultant and Director.
http://www.epoch.co.il - weaving the Net.
Cellular: 054-4848113
--------------------------------------------------
Just stumbled on the following post:
http://yoshinorimatsunobu.blogspot.com/2010/10/using-mysql-as-nosql-story-for.html
The post claim that MySQL can do more qps then MemCahed or any other NoSQL when doing simple queries like: SELECT * FROM table WHERE id=num;
And I wonder if:
1. Currently, is it possbile to achive the same using PG 9.0.x
2. Is it possible at all?
It seems to me that if such gain is possible, PG should benefit from that significantly when it comes to Key/Value queries.
Best,
Miki
--------------------------------------------------
Michael Ben-Nes - Internet Consultant and Director.
http://www.epoch.co.il - weaving the Net.
Cellular: 054-4848113
--------------------------------------------------
