Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Tom Polak
<tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What kind of performance can I expect out of Postgres compare to MSSQL?

You should take any generalizations with a grain of salt. I suggest
that you do a POC.

> Let's assume that Postgres is running on Cent OS x64 and MSSQL is running
> on Windows 2008 x64, both are on identical hardware running RAID 5 (for
> data redundancy/security), SAS drives 15k RPM, dual XEON Quad core CPUs,
> 24 GB of RAM.

RAID-5 = suckage for databases.

Things to think about:
How big is your data set and how big is your working set?
Do you have a raid card? Is it properly configured?


-- 
Rob Wultsch
wultsch@xxxxxxxxx

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux