Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Divakar Singh <dpsmails@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Storage test was simple, but the data (seconds taken) for INSERT test for PG vs Oracle for 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 indexes was:
> PG:
> 25
> 30
> 37
> 42
> 45
>
> Oracle:
>
> 33
> 43
> 50
> 65
> 68
> Rows inserted: 100,000
> Above results show good INSERT performance of PG when using SQL procedures. But performance when I use C++ lib is very bad. I did that test some time back so I do not have data for that right now.

So, assuming I wanted to reproduce your results, can you provide a
self contained test case that shows these differences?  I have always
gotten really good performance using libpq myself, so I'm looking for
what it is you might be doing differently from me that would make it
so slow.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux