Storage test was simple, but the data (seconds taken) for INSERT test for PG vs Oracle for 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 indexes was:
PG:
Oracle:
Rows inserted: 100,000
Above results show good INSERT performance of PG when using SQL procedures. But performance when I use C++ lib is very bad. I did that test some time back so I do not have data for that right now.
From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Divakar Singh <dpsmails@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, October 25, 2010 11:56:27 PM
Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Divakar Singh <dpsmails@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Experts,
> My application uses Oracle DB, and makes use of OCI interface.
> I have been able to develop similar interface using postgreSQL library.
> However, I have done some tests but results for PostgreSQL have not been
> encouraging for a few of them.
Tell us more about your tests and results please.
PG:
| 25 |
| 30 |
| 37 |
| 42 |
| 45 |
Oracle:
| 33 |
| 43 |
| 50 |
| 65 |
| 68 |
Above results show good INSERT performance of PG when using SQL procedures. But performance when I use C++ lib is very bad. I did that test some time back so I do not have data for that right now.
From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Divakar Singh <dpsmails@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, October 25, 2010 11:56:27 PM
Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Divakar Singh <dpsmails@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Experts,
> My application uses Oracle DB, and makes use of OCI interface.
> I have been able to develop similar interface using postgreSQL library.
> However, I have done some tests but results for PostgreSQL have not been
> encouraging for a few of them.
Tell us more about your tests and results please.
