On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 20:57 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Hannu Krosing <hannu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Craig Ringer > >> <craig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > So rather than asking "should core have a connection pool" perhaps > >> > what's needed is to ask "what can an in-core pool do that an external > >> > pool cannot do?" > >> > >> Avoid sending every connection through an extra hop. > > > > not really. in-core != magically-in-right-backend-process > > Well, how about if we arrange it so it IS in the right backend > process? I don't believe magic is required. Do you have any design in mind, how you can make it so ? --------------- Hannu -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
