On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Hannu Krosing <hannu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Craig Ringer >> <craig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > So rather than asking "should core have a connection pool" perhaps >> > what's needed is to ask "what can an in-core pool do that an external >> > pool cannot do?" >> >> Avoid sending every connection through an extra hop. > > not really. in-core != magically-in-right-backend-process Well, how about if we arrange it so it IS in the right backend process? I don't believe magic is required. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
