Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > So, Tom, so you think it's possible that the planner isn't noticing > all those nulls and thinks it'll just take a row or two to get to the > value it needs to join on? Could be. I don't have time right now to chase through the code, but that sounds like a plausible theory. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
