On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:47:30PM -0500, Andy Colson wrote: > > I guess, for me, once I started using PG and learned enough about it (all > db have their own quirks and dark corners) I was in love. It wasnt > important which db was fastest at xyz, it was which tool do I know, and > trust, that can solve problem xyz. > > (I added the "and trust" as an after thought, because I do have one very > important 100% uptime required mysql database that is running. Its my > MythTV box at home, and I have to ask permission from my GF before I take > the box down to upgrade anything. And heaven forbid if it crashes or > anything. So I do have experience with care and feeding of mysql. And no, > I'm not kidding.) > > And I choose PG. > Andy, you are so me! I have the exact same one-and-only-one mission critical mysql DB, but the gatekeeper is my wife. And experience with that instance has made me love and trust PostgreSQL even more. Ross -- Ross Reedstrom, Ph.D. reedstrm@xxxxxxxx Systems Engineer & Admin, Research Scientist phone: 713-348-6166 The Connexions Project http://cnx.org fax: 713-348-3665 Rice University MS-375, Houston, TX 77005 GPG Key fingerprint = F023 82C8 9B0E 2CC6 0D8E F888 D3AE 810E 88F0 BEDE -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
