Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Absolutely ...

- for fixed size rows with a lot of small updates, Oracle wins. BTW, as of Oracle 9 they're called "UNDO tablesapces"
- for lots of transactions and feely mixing transactions of all sizes, MVCC tables (Postgres) wins
- if you just want a structured filesystem and don't have integrity requirements or a lot of updates, MyISAM wins

For our app, Oracle would be the best, but it isn't strictly necessary so Postgres wins on price ;-)

Cheers
Dave

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Pierre C <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:14:51 +0100, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Dave Crooke <dcrooke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Note however that Oracle offeres full transactionality and does in place row
updates. There is more than one way to do it.

There's no free lunch.

MVCC : VACUUM
Oracle : Rollback Segments
MyISAM : no concurrency/transactions

It's all about which compromise suits you ;)


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux