Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Tom Lane escribió: >> That's not going to do anything towards reducing the actual I/O volume. >> Although I suppose it might be useful if it just cuts the number of >> seeks. > Oh, they had no problems with I/O volume. It was relation extension > lock that was heavily contended for them. Really? I guess that serialized all the I/O ... I'll bet if we got rid of that locking somehow, they *would* have a problem with I/O volume. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance