Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Feb 8, 2010, at 11:35 PM, david@xxxxxxx wrote:

And, yes, the whole I/O scheduling approach in Linux was just completely redesigned for a very recent kernel update. So even what we think we know is already obsolete in some respects.


I'd done some testing a while ago on the schedulers and at the time deadline or noop smashed cfq. Now, it is 100% possible since then that they've made vast improvements to cfq and or the VM to get better or similar performance. I recall a vintage of 2.6 where they severely messed up the VM. Glad I didn't upgrade to that one :)

Here's the old post: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2008-04/msg00155.php


--
Jeff Trout <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.stuarthamm.net/
http://www.dellsmartexitin.com/




--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux