On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Hmm, in that case, I think the problem is that this function has no >> comment explaining its intended charter. > > That's certainly a big problem, but a comment won't fix the fact that > the name is misleading. We need both a comment and a name change. I think you're probably right, but it's not clear what the new name should be until we have a comment explaining what the function is responsible for. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
