Robert Haas <robertmhaas@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hmm, in that case, I think the problem is that this function has no > comment explaining its intended charter. That's certainly a big problem, but a comment won't fix the fact that the name is misleading. We need both a comment and a name change. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
