My bad - I thought I had, so it has been re-posted with a (v2) disclaimer in
the title... like THAT will stop the flaming! <g>
Thanks for your patience!
"Craig James" <craig_james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4B4F8A49.7010906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Carlo Stonebanks wrote:
Guys, I want to thank you for all of the advice - my client has just made
a surprise announcement that he would like to set start from scratch with
a new server, so I am afraid that all of this great advice has to be seen
in the context of whatever decision is made on that. I am out there,
hat-in-hand, looking for advice under the PERFORM post: "New server to
improve performance on our large and busy DB - advice?"
You might start this as a new topic with a relevant title, and reiterate
your database requirements. Otherwise it will get submerged as just a
footnote to your original question. It's really nice to be able to
quickly find the new-equipment discussions.
Craig
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
