decibel escribió: > >If you want it to be seemless and fully optimal, you would > >introduce a new int256 type (or whatever the name of the type you > >are trying to represent). Adding new types to PostgreSQL is not > >that hard. This would allow queries (=, <>, <, >) as well. > > If you want an example of that, we had Command Prompt create a full > set of hash datatypes (SHA*, and I think md5). That stuff should be > on pgFoundry; if it's not drop me a note at jnasby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > and I'll get it added. It's at project "shatypes". -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
