On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You can't "turn off" sequential scans. You can only make the planner > less likely to choose them. But if there's no way to get the data you > need other than a seqscan, it's still going to do one. And that's not a bad thing. For a very small table, it's often the fastest method. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
