Re: Full text search with ORDER BY performance issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




If love is an uncommon word, there's no help for queries of this type
being slow unless the GIN index can return the results in order.  But
if love is a common word, then it would be faster to do an index scan
by timestamp on the baserel and then treat comment_tsv @@
plainto_tsquery('love') as a filter condition.  Is this a selectivity
estimation bug?

If you have really lots of documents to index (this seems the case) perhaps you should consider Xapian. It is very easy to use (although, of course, tsearch integrated in Postgres is much easier since you have nothing to install), and it is *incredibly* fast.

In my tests (2 years ago) with many gigabytes of stuff to search into, differences became obvious when the data set is much bigger than RAM. - Postgres' fulltext was 10-100x faster than MySQL fulltext on searches (lol) (and even a lot "more faster" on INSERTs...)
	- and Xapian was 10-100 times faster than Postgres' fulltext.

	(on a small table which fits in RAM, differences are small).
	
Of course Xapian is not Postgres when you talk about update concurrency.......... (single writer => fulltext index updating background job is needed, a simple Python script does the job)

--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux