On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Mark Mielke <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote: > > 2008/8/8 Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > noatime turns off the atime write behaviour. Or did you already know > that and I missed some weird post where noatime somehow managed to > slow down performance? > > > Scott, I'm quite aware of what noatime does ... you didn't miss a post, but > if you look at Mark's graphs on > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/HP_ProLiant_DL380_G5_Tuning_Guide > they pretty much all indicate that (unless I completely misinterpret the > meaning and purpose of the labels), independent of the file-system, > using noatime slows read/writes down (on average) > > That doesn't make sense - if noatime slows things down, then the analysis is > probably wrong. > > Now, modern Linux distributions default to "relatime" - which will only > update access time if the access time is currently less than the update time > or something like this. The effect is that modern Linux distributions do not > benefit from "noatime" as much as they have in the past. In this case, > "noatime" vs default would probably be measuring % noise. Interesting, now how would we see if it is defaulting to "relatime"? Regards, Mark
